Skip to main content
Download PDF

Highly sensitive near-infrared SERS nanoprobes for in vivo imaging using gold-assembled silica nanoparticles with controllable nanogaps

Journal of Nanobiotechnology volume 20, Article number: 130 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

To take advantages, such as multiplex capacity, non-photobleaching property, and high sensitivity, of surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)-based in vivo imaging, development of highly enhanced SERS nanoprobes in near-infrared (NIR) region is needed. A well-controlled morphology and biocompatibility are essential features of NIR SERS nanoprobes. Gold (Au)-assembled nanostructures with controllable nanogaps with highly enhanced SERS signals within multiple hotspots could be a breakthrough.

Results

Au-assembled silica (SiO2) nanoparticles (NPs) (SiO2@Au@Au NPs) as NIR SERS nanoprobes are synthesized using the seed-mediated growth method. SiO2@Au@Au NPs using six different sizes of Au NPs (SiO2@Au@Au50–SiO2@Au@Au500) were prepared by controlling the concentration of Au precursor in the growth step. The nanogaps between Au NPs on the SiO2 surface could be controlled from 4.16 to 0.98 nm by adjusting the concentration of Au precursor (hence increasing Au NP sizes), which resulted in the formation of effective SERS hotspots. SiO2@Au@Au500 NPs with a 0.98-nm gap showed a high SERS enhancement factor of approximately 3.8 × 106 under 785-nm photoexcitation. SiO2@Au@Au500 nanoprobes showed detectable in vivo SERS signals at a concentration of 16 μg/mL in animal tissue specimen at a depth of 7 mm. SiO2@Au@Au500 NPs with 14 different Raman label compounds exhibited distinct SERS signals upon subcutaneous injection into nude mice.

Conclusions

SiO2@Au@Au NPs showed high potential for in vivo applications as multiplex nanoprobes with high SERS sensitivity in the NIR region.

Graphical Abstract

Background

In vivo imaging is a powerful tool for observing the localized effects of drugs as well as biological phenomena in living tissues or organs. However, conventional imaging methods, such as magnetic resonance imaging or molecular imaging based on fluorophores, usually lack multiplex capability [1,2,3]. Moreover, fluorescence imaging suffers from sensitivity issue owing to the autofluorescence of living animal tissues in the presence of visible light. To overcome these problems, in vivo imaging using near-infrared (NIR) light has attracted considerable attention owing to the good penetration ability of NIR radiation into tissues [4,5,6]. To observe effects of different drugs simultaneously and their multiple tumor-targeting abilities using in vivo imaging techniques, multiplexing capacity is one of the virtues for in vivo imaging probes [7]. However, widely used NIR imaging probes, such as fluorescent dyes and upconversion luminescent nanoparticles (NPs), still exhibit issues of spectral overlap, hindering multiplex imaging [8,9,10].

Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) is a powerful tool for biological and chemical analyses and imaging owing to its high sensitivity, multiplexing ability, and selectivity [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. SERS using NIR-active NPs has been applied to multiplex imaging, given the narrow bandwidth (< 2 nm) of Raman signals [20,21,22]. Among several types of possible SERS NPs, gold NPs (Au NPs) have wide range of bioapplications [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30] based on the plasmon resonance phenomenon with visible and NIR radiations [31] because of their good biocompatibility and high stability under biological conditions compared to NPs of other metals (for example, silver and copper) [32,33,34]. However, compared with silver NPs (Ag NPs) that provide better SERS enhancement owing to their strong surface plasmon resonance properties [35], Au NPs still have relatively weak SERS signal enhancement ability.

Many researchers have attempted to build Au nanostructures to embed controllable nanogaps or to be effective as SERS nanoprobes, overcoming the limited SERS enhancement performance of Au NPs [36,37,38]. Wang et al. reported seed-mediated growth method for Au nanostars that exhibited strong absorbance in the NIR region and showed the possibility of imaging and treating cancer cells through photothermal therapy (PTT) [39]. Ding et al. reported sea urchin-like, flower-like, meatball-like, and polyhedral Au mesopores of various sizes and shapes [40]. Au NP-assembled nanostructures exhibited strong SERS signals, generating multiple hotspots within the nanogaps between small Au NPs [41]. However, Au NP-assembled nanostructures generated without seed-mediated growth method (usually with a long tedious synthesis process) were heterogenous in shape and had uncontrolled nanogaps.

We recently prepared Au-assembled silica (SiO2) NPs by precisely controlling the size of Au NPs on the surface of SiO2 NPs [42]. Currently, there are no studies on the relationship between nanogaps within Au NPs and their SERS characteristics, which can be a critical feature for NIR SERS imaging. In this study, Au NP-assembled SiO2 NPs (SiO2@Au@Au NPs) with small nanogaps were synthesized to develop NIR-active SERS nanoprobes. Various types of nanogaps as SERS hotspots were generated by controlling the degree of Au NP growth on the surface of SiO2 NPs. Our SiO2@Au@Au NPs showed single-particle level detection sensitivity under 785-nm NIR laser photoexcitation and were applied for in vitro imaging using HCT 116 cell line. To evaluate them as potential SERS nanoprobes, SiO2@Au@Au NPs labeled with 4-fluorobenzenethiol (4-FBT) were used to investigate the signal penetration depth in the porcine tissue and the detectable concentration limit upon subcutaneous injection. SiO2@Au@Au NPs labeled with 14 types of Raman labeling compounds (RLCs) exhibited distinct Raman spectra and unique bands upon subcutaneous injection. The highly enhanced SERS signals and spectroscopic features of SiO2@Au@Au NPs indicate that our NIR nanoprobes have the potential for use in multiplex imaging with various RLCs in vivo.

Materials and methods

Materials

Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTS), tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)-phosphonium chloride (THPC), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), gold(III) chloride trihydrate (HAuCl4), ascorbic acid (AA), paraformaldehyde, 4-FBT, 2-naphthalenethiol (2-NT), 3,5-dichlorobenzenethiol (3,5-DCT), 4-chlorobenzenethiol (4-CBT), 4-methylbenzenethiol (4-MBT), 4-mercaptophenol (4-MP), 4-bromobenzenethiol (4-BBT), 4-aminothiophenol (4-ATP), 4-mercaptobenzoic acid (4-MBA), 4-mercaptophenyl boronic acid (4-MPBA), benzenethiol (BT), 2-BBT, 3,4-DCT, and 2-FBT were purchased form Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Ethanol (EtOH) and aqueous ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) were purchased from Daejung (Sihung-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea). Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was purchased from Samchun (Pyeongtaek-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea). Deionized water (DW) was obtained using a Millipore water purification system (Vivagen, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi‐do, South Korea). HCT 116 cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA, USA). Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium was purchased from Biowest (Riverside, MO, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from JCBIO (Seoul, South Korea). Penicillin–streptomycin was purchased from Welgene (Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea). Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was purchased from BYLABS (Hanam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea). Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was purchased from LPS Solution (Daejeon-si, South Korea). Eight-week-old female BALB/c athymic nude mice were purchased from Orient Bio Inc. (Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea).

Raman spectroscopy measurements

All SERS spectra were obtained using a confocal micro Raman system (XperRF, Nanobase) equipped with an optical microscope (BX41M-LED; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The signal was detected using a thermoelectrically cooled (− 60 °C) charge-coupled device detector (Idus 416, Andor Technology). The 532-, 660-, and 785-nm photoexcitation lasers were focused, and the Raman signals except the SERS enhancement factor (EF) calculation data were collected using a × 10 objective lens (0.25 NA, Olympus).

Preparation of SiO2@Au@Au NPs

SiO2@Au was synthesized using a previously reported method [42]. Au NPs (3 nm) were prepared using the Turkevich method. Briefly, 1.5 mL of 0.2 M NaOH, 12 μL of THPC, and 1.5 mL of HAuCl4 solution (50 mM) were added to 47.5 mL of DW. The mixture was vigorously stirred for 1 h and stored in a refrigerator for at least two days. In addition, 62 μL of APTS and 40 μL of NH4OH were added to 1 mL of SiO2 NPs (50 mg/mL), and the mixture was stirred overnight at 700 rpm to produce aminated SiO2 NPs (SiO2-NH2 NPs), which were then washed several times with EtOH by centrifugation; subsequently, 10 mL of Au NPs and 200 μL of SiO2-NH2 NPs (10 mg/mL) were mixed and stirred overnight. SiO2@Au NPs were obtained after washing several times with EtOH by centrifugation, which were dispersed in 2 mL of DW containing 2 mg of PVP.

SiO2@Au@Au NPs were prepared according to a method described in our previous study [42] with slight modifications. Briefly, SiO2@Au@Au NPs were synthesized using the seed-mediated growth method with SiO2@Au NP as a seed and Au precursor. To grow Au into SiO2@Au seed, 200 μL of SiO2@Au NPs (1 mg/mL) was dispersed in 9.8 mL DW containing 10 mg of PVP. This suspension was stirred after adding 20 μL of HAuCl4 (10 mM) and treated with 40 μL of AA (10 mM) every 5 min until the desired concentration of Au3+ was achieved (50, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 μM), which was then washed several times with EtOH by centrifugation to obtain SiO2@Au@Au50–SiO2@Au@Au500 NPs.

Labeling SiO2@Au@Au with Raman compounds

An RLC solution (2 mM) was prepared and added to 1 mL of SiO2@Au@Au NPs (1 mg/mL). The mixture was vigorously shaken for 1 h at 25 ℃, and thus obtained RLC-conjugated SiO2@Au@Au NPs were washed several times with EtOH by centrifugation. Subsequently, Raman-labeled SiO2@Au@Au (SiO2@Au@Au-RLC) NPs were redispersed in 1 mL of EtOH.

SERS measurement of SiO2@Au@Au-RLC NPs

SiO2@Au@Au-RLC suspension (1 mg/mL) was injected into a capillary tube. SERS spectrum of each NP was measured thrice using microscopic Raman system. Measurement was carried out under 532-nm photoexcitation at 1 mW, 660-nm photoexcitation at 1.2 mW, and 785-nm photoexcitation at 2.1 mW laser power using a × 10 objective lens with 5-s acquisition time.

Calculation of SERS enhancement factor (EF)

Further Raman spectroscopic studies and bioapplication experiments were carried out using SiO2@Au@Au500, where the SERS EF of SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT NPs under 785-nm photoexcitation was estimated using the following equation: EF = (ISERS × Nnormal)/(Inormal × NSERS), where ISERS and Inormal indicate the intensity of the Raman band from SERS and normal Raman, respectively, and Nnormal and NSERS are the numbers of 4-FBT molecules in the pure and assembled forms, respectively, on the surface of SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT NPs. The Raman signal intensity was measured for both pure 4-FBT and single-particle level using identical × 100 objective lens (0.90 NA, Olympus) under the following conditions: 0.3 mW laser power and 5-s acquisition time. The 4-FBT peak at 1075 cm−1 was used to estimate the EF. ISERS was defined as an average value of the peak intensities of 20 individual particles. The probing volume (18.84 μm2) for the normal Raman measurement was approximated using a cylindrical form with a diameter of 2 μm and height of 6 μm. Assuming that 4-FBT molecules form a monolayer on the surface of NPs, NSERS was calculated based on the surface area of NPs (assuming that SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT has a spherical shape, r = 115 nm) and the molecular footprint of 4-FBT (0.383 nm2/molecule) [43].

Cytotoxicity of SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT in HCT 116 cells

HCT 116 cells (human colon cancer cell line) were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C in humidified air with 5% CO2. Cytotoxicity of NPs was estimated using the crystal violet assay. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated with different concentrations (0, 1.95, 3.90, 7.81, 15.63, 31.25, and 62.50 mg/mL) of SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT NPs at 37 °C for 24 h. After incubation, the culture medium was removed, and the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h. Then, the cells were washed with DW and air dried. The cells in each well were treated with 100 μL of 0.5% crystal violet solution. After 10 min, the solution was removed and the plates were washed with DW and air dried. Subsequently, the cells were lysed with 1% SDS, and absorbance was measured using VICTOR X3 multilabel plate reader (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) at 570 nm.

SERS imaging of HCT 116 cells

Cells were seeded in a 60-mm dish and incubated with 50 μg/mL SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT NPs at 37 °C for 24 h. After incubation, the culture medium was removed, and the cells were washed thrice with 1 × PBS. Cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h, washed with PBS, and dried at room temperature. Then, the SERS mapping images were obtained by point-by-point mapping (step size: 1 μm) using a × 100 objective lens with a 785-nm excitation source, 0.3-mW laser power, and 1-s acquisition time.

Depth profile evaluation of SiO2@Au@Au SERS signal

To evaluate the depth profile of SiO2@Au@Au SERS signal, NPs were injected into the porcine tissue, and the Raman spectra were measured. First, 15 μL of SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT (1 mg/mL) was dispersed in DW and injected into the porcine tissue with a 26-gauge syringe at different depths (1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 mm). SERS signals of NPs inside the tissue were measured immediately after injection using a × 10 objective lens with a 785-nm excitation source, 2.1-mW laser power, and 10-s acquisition time.

In vivo multiplexing SERS imaging

To conduct multiplexing SERS imaging in nude mice, 14 different types of RLCs (4-MBT, 4-MBA, 4-FBT, 4-MPBA, 4-BBT, 4-ATP, 4-CBT, 3,4-DCT, 2-BBT, 3,5-DCT, BT, 2-FBT, 4-MP, and 2-NT) were conjugated to SiO2@Au@Au. After adaptation for one week, the mice were euthanized and subcutaneously injected with 15 μL of SiO2@Au@Au500-RLC. Diluted SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT (1000, 500, 250, 125, 63, 31, 16, 8, and 4 μg/mL) were injected into another mouse. Each measurement was performed using a × 10 objective lens with a 785-nm excitation source, 2.1-mW laser power, and 10-s acquisition time. Mice were maintained in accordance with the guidelines approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Konkuk University.

Results and discussion

Characterization and SERS properties of SiO2@Au@Au NPs

SiO2@Au@Au NPs were prepared using the method described in our previous study, with modifications [42]. Briefly, SiO2@Au@Au was prepared by introducing Au NPs into SiO2 to facilitate the growth of Au (Fig. 1). SiO2 NPs were prepared according to the Stöber method (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Subsequently, Au NPs were introduced into SiO2 following treatment with APTS. SiO2@Au was used as a seed in the seed-mediated growth method (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). SiO2@Au seed (195.30 ± 13.16 nm) contained several Au NPs of very small size (3 nm) attached to the SiO2 NP surface. It is imperative to control the size of Au NPs on the SiO2 core to achieve a gap-enhanced SERS efficacy to create a strong local field between the Au NP gaps. In this regard, SiO2@Au@Au NPs were fabricated using SiO2@Au NP as a seed with varying concentrations of Au precursor (50, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 μM). After application of the growth method, the six prepared SiO2@Au@Au NPs were 212.80 ± 7.35, 213.54 ± 7.14, 215.81 ± 8.30, 219.56 ± 9.36, 229.47 ± 9.85, and 229.48 ± 7.27 nm in size, corresponding to Au precursor concentrations of 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 μM, respectively (Fig. 2). With addition of higher concentration of Au precursor, the overall size of the NPs increased owing to the growth of Au NPs. The maximum concentration of Au precursor was 500 μM to prevent formation of merged structures (loss of particle morphology feature of Au NP) and seedings exclude Si NPs (Additional file 1: Fig. S3). The seed-mediated growth method allowed dense packing of Au NPs on the SiO2 core surface, in contrast to the direct attachment of large-sized Au NPs on the SiO2 core (Additional file 1: Fig. S4).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic illustration of the preparation process of SiO2@Au@Au using SiO2@Au as a seed

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Morphology analysis of SiO2@Au@Au containing various concentrations of gold(III) chloride hydrate by transmission electron microscopy. SiO2@Au@Au synthesized using (a) 50 μM, (b) 100 μM, (c) 200 μM, (d) 300 μM, (e) 400 μM, and (f) 500 μM gold(III) chloride hydrate. Each scale bar of inset images is 50 nm. Overall size and nanogap between Au NPs were controlled by gold(III) chloride hydrate concentration

Full size image

Figure 3a shows the absorbance of each prepared SiO2@Au@Au NP. The absorbance increased at all wavelengths with increase in Au precursor concentration, particularly in the NIR region. In addition, the maximum absorption wavelength (λmax) showed a red-shift with an increase in the concentration of Au precursor. This phenomenon is attributed to strong plasmonic coupling caused by the growth of Au NPs on the SiO2 NP surfaces. As the absorbance changed, the color of the NPs dispersed in the solvent (EtOH) changed from light pink to dark blue (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3
figure 3

UV/Vis absorbance spectra and Raman spectroscopic characterization of SiO2@Au@Au. a UV/Vis absorbance spectra of SiO2@Au@Au with various concentrations of gold(III) chloride hydrate and (b) different optical colors of each SiO2@Au@Au. c Raman intensities of SiO2@Au@Au with various concentrations of gold(III) chloride hydrate captured using a 785-nm laser. (d) Raman intensities of SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT using blue visible light (532 nm), red visible light (660 nm), and near-infrared (NIR) light (785 nm) as photoexcitation sources. e Nanogap sizes of SiO2@Au@Au NPs. f Calculated enhancement factor (EF) of single SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT under NIR light based on the SERS intensity of 1075 cm−1

Full size image

To investigate the SERS characteristics of SiO2@Au@Au, SERS spectra of the six SiO2@Au@Au NPs after treatment with 4-FBT were measured using three different laser lines (532, 660, and 785 nm) (Fig. 3c; Additional file 1: Fig. S4). Raman signals were not detectable for any of the six SiO2@Au@Au-4-FBT NPs at 532 nm (Additional file 1: Fig. S4a). This was due to the relatively weak plasmonic resonances of the six SiO2@Au@Au NPs irradiated with light at a wavelength of 532 nm. SERS spectra obtained using a 660-nm laser revealed distinct bands for SiO2@Au@Au NPs treated with 200, 300, 400, and 500 μM Au precursor (Additional file 1: Fig. S4b). SERS signals measured using a 785-nm laser were stronger than those obtained using a 532-nm laser and 660-nm laser except the SiO2@Au@Au NPs treated with 50 μM Au precursor, for which no signal was detected (Fig. 3c; Additional file 1: Fig. S5). A comparison between 4-FBT SERS signal of SiO2@Au@Au500 at 1075 cm−1 peak showed that the Raman intensity with 785-nm photoexcitation was 7.7 times higher than that measured using 660-nm laser (Fig. 3d).

SERS spectra of SiO2@Au@Au NPs captured using 660-nm and 785-nm lasers showed enhanced Raman signals with an increase in the number of Au NPs on the SiO2 surface. This could be attributed not only to the stronger absorbance but also to the narrower nanogap between Au NPs, leading to a highly amplified SERS signal. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images (Fig. 2) show that the nanogaps between Au NPs on the SiO2 core gradually decreased as the concentration of Au NPs increased. The nanogap sizes were measured to be 4.16 ± 1.04, 3.76 ± 1.09, 3.68 ± 1.29, 1.98 ± 0.50, 1.17 ± 0.32, and 0.98 ± 0.19 nm for NPs treated with 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 μM Au precursor, respectively (Fig. 3e). The strongest Raman signal of SiO2@Au@Au NPs with 500 μM Au precursor during Au seed growth might be because the electromagnetic field was concentrated in 1-nm nanogaps. The seed-mediated growth method for SiO2@Au@Au NPs was validated as a powerful strategy to precisely control the nanogap size and maximize the SERS enhancement.

Considering that SiO2@Au@Au500 NPs have a higher absorbance in the NIR region and show the strongest Raman enhancement ability among all prepared NPs, the following experiments were performed using SiO2@Au@Au500. Using 4-FBT molecule as an RLC, the SERS spectra of 20 single particles of SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT were measured, and the average EF value was estimated to be 3.8 × 106 with good uniformity (3.45% relative standard deviation on log scale) (Fig. 3f). Compared to other noble metal-based NPs, the assembled structure had a lower EF value owing to the large surface area for RLC binding. However, the higher intensity and signal uniformity of each nanocomposite could be an advantageous feature of the assembled structures [44]. SiO2@Au@Au500 exhibited higher EF values than those reported for other noble metal-assembled NPs (Table 1). Although the EF value is smaller than that of bumpy silver nanoshells, Au-assembled SiO2 NPs are more stable than Ag-based NPs under biological conditions [45].

Table 1 Comparison of enhancement factor of different metal-assembled nanoparticles
Full size table

SERS imaging of HCT 116 cancer cell with SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT

Before using SiO2@Au@Au for in vitro applications, a cytotoxicity test was conducted using HCT 116 cell line. SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT NPs were prepared at a concentration of 62.5 μg/mL (26.38 × 108 particles/mL) and serially diluted for the cytotoxicity test (Additional file 1: Fig. S6). Cell viability was more than 90% at all concentrations of SiO2@Au@Au NPs within 24 h. Moreover, biocompatibility of SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT NPs at a concentration of 62.5 μg/mL or lower was confirmed.

To obtain images of HCT 116 cancer cells through SERS, the cells were incubated with SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT NPs for 24 h. NPs were either attached to the cell surface or entered the cell, whereas the remaining NPs were washed out. Additional file 1: Figure S7a shows the SERS mapping image at 1075 cm−1. The overlay image of HCT 116 cells and the adsorbed NPs showed that SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT NPs were attached to the edge of the cell. We compared the Raman intensity at different locations on the cell and observed no Raman signal outside the cell (i), weak Raman signal at the cell surface (ii), and extremely strong Raman signal inside the cell (iii) (Additional file 1: Fig. S7b). This observation confirmed the possibility of SERS imaging of cancer cells using SiO2@Au@Au NPs.

Sensitivity of SERS signal of SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT

To investigate the SERS signal depth profile of SiO2@Au@Au, we injected SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT NPs into the porcine tissue at different depths (1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 mm) and measured the SERS spectra (Fig. 4a). As the depth increased, the Raman intensity decreased (Fig. 4b). However, a measurable signal was detected up to a depth of 7 mm. For an accurate analysis, the Raman band intensities at 382, 620, and 1075 cm−1 were normalized to the signal intensity at a depth of 1 mm (Fig. 4c). The Raman intensity decreased as NPs were injected deeper inside the porcine tissue, and the Raman spectra distinct from that of the tissue without NP injection was observed until a depth of 7 mm. We conclude that the SiO2@Au@Au NPs generated a detectable SERS signal until the maximum depth of 7 mm in animal tissues. Thus, SERS detection using SiO2@Au@Au NPs was attempted through subcutaneous injection into animals.

Fig. 4
figure 4

a Schematic illustration for the depth profile evaluation of SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT using the porcine tissue. b Raman spectra of SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT injected into the porcine tissue at different depths (1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 mm). c Correlation between normalized SERS intensities at 382, 620, and 1075 cm−1 for Raman spectra in b and the injection depth from the surface of the porcine tissue. The Raman intensity decreased as the injection depth of SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT increased, and was detectable up to the injection depth of 7 mm

Full size image

For in vivo imaging, it is crucial to use small amounts of NPs to avoid side effects such as blood clots [46]. To determine the detectable concentration limit, various concentrations of SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT from 1000 to 4 μg/mL were subcutaneously injected into nude mice, and the SERS spectra were measured using a 785-nm laser (Fig. 5a, b). The Raman intensity decreased as the concentration of SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT NPs decreased; however, a sufficient signal was observed at a concentration of 16 μg/mL (Fig. 5c). To compare these results, the Raman bands intensities at 382, 620, and 1075 cm−1 were normalized to the Raman signal at 1000 μg/mL (Fig. 5d). The strong SERS signal of SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT allowed for the subcutaneous detection of particles even at a very low concentration (16 μg/mL), showing sufficient signal sensitivity.

Fig. 5
figure 5

a Photograph of mouse injected with various concentrations of SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT and (b) the injection position. c Raman spectra of SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT injected at concentrations from 1000 to 4 μg/mL. d Normalized SERS intensities at 382, 620, and 1075 cm−1 for Raman spectra in c. Raman intensity-concentration curve revealed logarithmic relationship between SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT concentration and SERS intensity

Full size image

In vivo multiplex imaging potential

To investigate the multiplex imaging potential of SiO2@Au@Au, 14 different RLC-treated NPs (SiO2@Au@Au-RLC) were prepared and injected subcutaneously into nude mice (Fig. 6a). The Raman spectra from each location were measured using a 785-nm laser. Distinct Raman spectra were obtained for the 14 types of NPs (Fig. 6b), which showed unique bands for code (label) identification (4-MBT: 324 cm−1; 4-MBA: 332 cm−1; 4-FBT: 347 cm−1; 4-MPBA: 469 cm−1; 4-BBT: 494 cm−1; 4-ATP: 503 cm−1; 4-CBT: 536 cm−1; 3,4-DCT: 563 cm−1; 2-BBT: 710 cm−1; 3,5-DCT: 782 cm−1; BT: 1020 cm−1; 2-FBT: 1115 cm−1; 4-MP: 1168 cm−1; and 2-NT: 1378 cm−1). To the best of our knowledge, the present study used the highest number of labels for NIR-active nanoprobes; the previously reported maximum number of RLCs for multiplex imaging based on SERS was 10 [3]. Thus, our SiO2@Au@Au NPs with multiple hotspots and narrow nanogaps exhibited high stability, allowing attachment of 14 different RLCs.

Fig. 6
figure 6

a Photograph of mouse injected with 14 different SiO2@Au@Au-RLC with 14 different Raman labeling compounds (RLCs). b Comparison of the 14 normalized Raman spectra of SiO2@Au@ Au-RLC injected into nude mouse with spectra from location without NP injection at 785-nm photoexcitation light, 2.1-mW laser power, and 10-s acquisition time. Each showed distinct Raman spectra with unique bands for label identification

Full size image

Conclusions

SiO2@Au@Au NPs were prepared using the seed-mediated growth method; six SiO2@Au@Au NPs of different sizes were fabricated on the surface of SiO2 NPs by controlling the concentration of Au precursor (50, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 μM). With increase in concentration of Au precursor, SiO2@Au@Au showed stronger absorbance, particularly in the NIR region. In addition, multiple hotspots and narrow nanogaps of approximately 1 nm were obtained by increasing the concentration of Au precursor during the growth process, enabling single particle-level detection. The SERS measurement revealed the Raman signal of high intensity after 785-nm laser photoexcitation. SiO2@Au@Au NPs obtained using 500 μM Au precursor exhibited an average SERS EF value of 3.83 × 106. SiO2@Au@Au NPs were successfully applied for the SERS imaging of HCT 116 cancer cells. In addition, owing to the advantages of NIR radiation and detection, the SERS signal could be measured even at a depth of 7 mm in the porcine tissue. The detectable concentration limit of NPs for subcutaneous injection was 16 μg/mL. Moreover, the multiplexing capability of the prepared SiO2@Au@Au was investigated by subcutaneously injecting 14 different SiO2@Au@Au-RLC NPs into nude mice. In this study, we fabricated highly sensitive NIR SERS nanoprobes with very strong SERS signals owing to their structure with uniformly synthesized multiple hotspots and narrow nanogaps. Along with the advantageous features of absorbing long-wavelength light and highly enhanced Raman signals, our SiO2@Au@Au structure can potentially be used for multiplex molecular imaging and in vivo applications.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Additional files.

Abbreviations

AA:

Ascorbic acid

APTS:

(3-Aminopropyl)triethoxysilane

ATCC:

American Type Culture Collection

BT:

Benzenethiol

DW:

Deionized water

EtOH:

Ethanol

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

HAuCl4 :

Gold(III) chloride trihydrate

NaOH:

Sodium hydroxide

NH4OH:

Aqueous ammonium hydroxide

NIR:

Near-infrared

NPs:

Nanoparticles

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

PTT:

Photothermal therapy

PVP:

Polyvinylpyrrolidone

RLCs:

Raman labeling compounds

SERS:

Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy

SDS:

Sodium dodecyl sulphate

SiO2 :

Silica

SiO2@Au@Au:

Au-assembled silica nanoparticle

TEOS:

Tetraethyl orthosilicate

THPC:

Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)-phosphonium chloride

2-BBT:

2-Bromobenzenethiol

2-FBT:

2- Fluorobenzenethiol

2-NT:

2-Naphthalenethiol

3,4-DCT:

3,4-Dichlorobenzenethiol

3,5-DCT:

3,5-Dichlorobenzenethiol

4-ATP:

4-Aminothiophenol

4-BBT:

4-Bromobenzenethiol

4-CBT:

4-Chlorobenzenethiol

4-FBT:

4-Fluorobenzenethiol

4-MBA:

4-Mercaptobenzoic acid

4-MBT:

4-Methylbenzenethiol

4-MP:

4-Mercaptophenol

4-MPBA:

4-Mercaptophenyl boronic acid

References

  1. Darvishi V, Navidbakhsh M, Amanpour S. Heat and mass transfer in the hyperthermia cancer treatment by magnetic nanoparticles. Heat Mass Transf. 2021. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s00231-021-03161-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gu Q, Joglekar T, Bieberich C, Ma R, Zhu L. Nanoparticle redistribution in PC3 tumors induced by local heating in magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia: in vivo experimental study. J Heat Transfer. 2019;141(3):032402.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zavaleta CL, Smith BR, Walton I, Doering W, Davis G, Shojaei B, Natan MJ, Gambhir SS. Multiplexed imaging of surface enhanced Raman scattering nanotags in living mice using noninvasive Raman spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:13511–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Weissleder R. A clearer vision for in vivo imaging. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19:316–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yuan L, Lin W, Zhao S, Gao W, Chen B, He L, Zhu S. A unique approach to development of near-infrared fluorescent sensors for in vivo imaging. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:13510–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim JS, Kim Y-H, Kim JH, Kang KW, Tae EL, Youn H, Kim D, Kim S-K, Kwon J-T, Cho M-H. Development and in vivo imaging of a PET/MRI nanoprobe with enhanced NIR fluorescence by dye encapsulation. Nanomedicine. 2012;7:219–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fan Y, Wang P, Lu Y, Wang R, Zhou L, Zheng X, Li X, Piper JA, Zhang F. Lifetime-engineered NIR-II nanoparticles unlock multiplexed in vivo imaging. Nat nanotechnol. 2018;13:941–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Haraguchi T, Shimi T, Koujin T, Hashiguchi N, Hiraoka Y. Spectral imaging fluorescence microscopy. Genes Cells. 2002;7:881–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koide Y, Urano Y, Hanaoka K, Piao W, Kusakabe M, Saito N, Terai T, Okabe T, Nagano T. Development of NIR fluorescent dyes based on Si–rhodamine for in vivo imaging. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:5029–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou J, Sun Y, Du X, Xiong L, Hu H, Li F. Dual-modality in vivo imaging using rare-earth nanocrystals with near-infrared to near-infrared (NIR-to-NIR) upconversion luminescence and magnetic resonance properties. Biomaterials. 2010;31:3287–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schlücker S. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: concepts and chemical applications. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53:4756–95.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma B, Frontiera RR, Henry A-I, Ringe E, Van Duyne RP. SERS: materials, applications, and the future. Mater Today. 2012;15:16–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lim D-K, Jeon K-S, Kim HM, Nam J-M, Suh YD. Nanogap-engineerable Raman-active nanodumbbells for single-molecule detection. Nat Mater. 2010;9:60–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kneipp J, Kneipp H, Kneipp K. SERS—a single-molecule and nanoscale tool for bioanalytics. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37:1052–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hahm E, Kim Y-H, Pham X-H, Jun B-H. Highly reproducible surface-enhanced Raman scattering detection of alternariol using silver-embedded silica nanoparticles. Sensors. 2020;20:3523.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Pham X-H, Hahm E, Huynh K-H, Kim H-M, Son BS, Jeong DH, Jun B-H. Sensitive and selective detection of 4-aminophenol in the presence of acetaminophen using gold–silver core–shell nanoparticles embedded in silica nanostructures. J Ind Eng Chem. 2020;83:208–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kang H, Koh Y, Jeong S, Jeong C, Cha MG, Oh M-H, Yang J-K, Lee H, Jeong DH, Jun B-H. Graphical and SERS dual-modal identifier for encoding OBOC library. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2020;303:127211.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pham X-H, Hahm E, Kang E, Son BS, Ha Y, Kim H-M, Jeong DH, Jun B-H. Control of silver coating on Raman label incorporated gold nanoparticles assembled silica nanoparticles. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:1258.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Pham X-H, Hahm E, Kim TH, Kim H-M, Lee SH, Lee SC, Kang H, Lee H-Y, Jeong DH, Choi HS. Enzyme-amplified SERS immunoassay with Ag–Au bimetallic SERS hot spots. Nano Res. 2020;13:3338–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Keren S, Zavaleta C, Cheng ZD, de la Zerda A, Gheysens O, Gambhir S. Noninvasive molecular imaging of small living subjects using Raman spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:5844–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Chang H, Kang H, Yang J-K, Jo A, Lee H-Y, Lee Y-S, Jeong DH. Ag Shell–Au satellite hetero-nanostructure for ultra-sensitive, reproducible, and homogeneous NIR SERS activity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6:11859–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nolan JP, Duggan E, Liu E, Condello D, Dave I, Stoner SA. Single cell analysis using surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) tags. Methods. 2012;57:272–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jin Y. Engineering plasmonic gold nanostructures and metamaterials for biosensing and nanomedicine. Adv Mater. 2012;24:5153–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Han J, Zhang J, Yang M, Cui D, Jesus M. Glucose-functionalized Au nanoprisms for optoacoustic imaging and near-infrared photothermal therapy. Nanoscale. 2015;8:492–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Du L, Suo S, Wang G, Jia H, Liu KJ, Zhao B, Liu Y. Mechanism and cellular kinetic studies of the enhancement of antioxidant activity by using surface-functionalized gold nanoparticles. Chem Eur J. 2013;19:1281–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zeng S, Yong K-T, Roy I, Dinh X-Q, Yu X, Luan F. A review on functionalized gold nanoparticles for biosensing applications. Plasmonics. 2011;6:491–506.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Frederix F, Friedt J-M, Choi K-H, Laureyn W, Campitelli A, Mondelaers D, Maes G, Borghs G. Biosensing based on light absorption of nanoscaled gold and silver particles. Anal Chem. 2003;75:6894–900.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao W, Brook MA, Li Y. Design of gold nanoparticle-based colorimetric biosensing assays. ChemBioChem. 2008;9:2363–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Murphy CJ, Gole AM, Stone JW, Sisco PN, Alkilany AM, Goldsmith EC, Baxter SC. Gold nanoparticles in biology: beyond toxicity to cellular imaging. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:1721–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang X, Jain PK, El-Sayed IH, El-Sayed MA. Plasmonic photothermal therapy (PPTT) using gold nanoparticles. Lasers Med Sci. 2008;23:217–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Anker JN, Hall WP, Lyandres O, Shah NC, Zhao J, Van Duyne RP. Biosensing with plasmonic nanosensors. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2010;308–319.

  32. Lewinski N, Colvin V, Drezek R. Cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. Small. 2008;4:26–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Connor EE, Mwamuka J, Gole A, Murphy CJ, Wyatt MD. Gold nanoparticles are taken up by human cells but do not cause acute cytotoxicity. Small. 2005;1:325–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Giljohann DA, Seferos DS, Daniel WL, Massich MD, Patel PC, Mirkin CA. Gold nanoparticles for biology and medicine. Angew Chem Int. 2010;49:3280–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lai C-H, Wang G-A, Ling T-K, Wang T-J, Chiu P-K, Chau Y-FC, Huang C-C, Chiang H-P. Near infrared surface-enhanced Raman scattering based on star-shaped gold/silver nanoparticles and hyperbolic metamaterial. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Huang J, Zhang L, Chen B, Ji N, Chen F, Zhang Y, Zhang Z. Nanocomposites of size-controlled gold nanoparticles and graphene oxide: formation and applications in SERS and catalysis. Nanoscale. 2010;2:2733–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ando J, Fujita K, Smith NI, Kawata S. Dynamic SERS imaging of cellular transport pathways with endocytosed gold nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2011;11:5344–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Polavarapu L, Xu Q-H. Water-soluble conjugated polymer-induced self-assembly of gold nanoparticles and its application to SERS. Langmuir. 2008;24:10608–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Song C, Li F, Guo X, Chen W, Dong C, Zhang J, Zhang J, Wang L. Gold nanostars for cancer cell-targeted SERS-imaging and NIR light-triggered plasmonic photothermal therapy (PPTT) in the first and second biological windows. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7:2001–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. You H, Ji Y, Wang L, Yang S, Yang Z, Fang J, Song X, Ding B. Interface synthesis of gold mesocrystals with highly roughened surfaces for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J Mater Chem. 2012;22:1998–2006.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Pazos-Perez N, Fitzgerald JM, Giannini V, Guerrini L, Alvarez-Puebla RA. Modular assembly of plasmonic core–satellite structures as highly brilliant SERS-encoded nanoparticles. Nanoscale Adv. 2019;1:122–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Seong B, Bock S, Hahm E, Huynh K-H, Kim J, Lee SH, Pham X-H, Jun B-H. Synthesis of densely immobilized gold-assembled silica nanostructures. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:2543.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Jiang P, Deng K, Fichou D, Xie S-S, Nion A, Wang C. STM imaging ortho-and para-fluorothiophenol self-assembled monolayers on Au (111). Langmuir. 2009;25:5012–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jeon MJ, Ma X, Lee JU, Roh H, Bagot CC, Park W, Sim SJ. Precisely controlled three-dimensional gold nanoparticle assembly based on spherical bacteriophage scaffold for molecular sensing via surface-enhanced Raman scattering. J Phys Chem C. 2021;125:2502–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Chang H, Ko E, Kang H, Cha MG, Lee Y-S, Jeong DH. Synthesis of optically tunable bumpy silver nanoshells by changing the silica core size and their SERS activities. RSC Adv. 2017;7:40255–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Ajdari N, Vyas C, Bogan SL, Lwaleed BA, Cousins BG. Gold nanoparticle interactions in human blood: a model evaluation. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2017;13:1531–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Kim H-M, Jeong S, Hahm E, Kim J, Cha MG, Kim K-M, Kang H, Kyeong S, Pham X-H, Lee Y-S. Large scale synthesis of surface-enhanced Raman scattering nanoprobes with high reproducibility and long-term stability. J Ind Eng Chem. 2016;33:22–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kang H, Jeong S, Park Y, Yim J, Jun B-H, Kyeong S, Yang J-K, Kim G, Hong S, Lee LP, et al. Near-infrared SERS nanoprobes with plasmonic Au/Ag hollow-shell assemblies for in vivo multiplex detection. Adv Funct Mater. 2013;23:3719–27.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (2021R1A4A5031762 and 2021M3C1C3097211).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Sungje Bock, Yun-Sik Choi and Minhee Kim contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Seoul, 05029, South Korea

    Sungje Bock, Minhee Kim, Yewon Yun, Xuan-Hung Pham, Jaehi Kim, Bomi Seong, Wooyeon Kim, Ahla Jo, Kyeong-Min Ham, Dong-Eun Kim & Bong-Hyun Jun

  2. Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, South Korea

    Yun-Sik Choi, Sung Gun Lee & Dae Hong Jeong

  3. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Hanbat National University, Deajeon, 34158, South Korea

    Sang Hun Lee

  4. Department of Radiology, Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA

    Homan Kang & Hak Soo Choi

  5. Division of Science Education, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, South Korea

    Hyejin Chang

Authors
  1. Sungje Bock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yun-Sik Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Minhee Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yewon Yun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xuan-Hung Pham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jaehi Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bomi Seong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wooyeon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ahla Jo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kyeong-Min Ham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Sung Gun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Sang Hun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Homan Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Hak Soo Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Dae Hong Jeong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Hyejin Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Dong-Eun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Bong-Hyun Jun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SB, XHP, and BHJ conceived the idea and designed the experiments. SB, YSC, MK, YY, JK, BS, WK, AJ, KMH, and SGL performed the experiments. SHL, HK, HSC, and DHJ analyzed the data. SB wrote the manuscript. HC, DEK, and BHJ supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hyejin Chang, Dong-Eun Kim or Bong-Hyun Jun.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Fig S1

. TEM image of SiO2 NPs. Fig S2. TEM image of SiO2@Au used as a seed. Fig S3. TEM image of SiO2@Au@Au synthesized using 600 μM gold(III) chloride hydrate. Fig S4. TEM image of SiO2@Au synthesized by directly attaching large-sized Au NPs (10–15 nm) to aminated silica (not a growth method). Fig S5. SERS intensities of SiO2@Au@Au-4-FBT synthesized using various concentrations of gold(III) chloride hydrate determined at (a) blue visible light (wavelength, 532 nm) and (b) red visible light (wavelength, 660 nm). Fig S6. Cytotoxicity test using HCT 116 cells incubated with different concentrations of SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT. Fig S7. (a) Optical image, SERS mapping image, and overlay image of human colon carcinoma (HCT 116) cells incubated with 50 μg/mL SiO2@Au@Au500-4-FBT. (b) Raman intensities at different locations: outside the cell (i), on the cell surface (ii), and inside the cell (iii), corresponding to the overlay images shown in (a).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bock, S., Choi, YS., Kim, M. et al. Highly sensitive near-infrared SERS nanoprobes for in vivo imaging using gold-assembled silica nanoparticles with controllable nanogaps. J Nanobiotechnol 20, 130 (2022). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12951-022-01327-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12951-022-01327-7

Keywords

Journal of Nanobiotechnology

ISSN: 1477-3155

Contact us